OMP M2 Explorer vs Goosky S2: which 200-class to buy
Two near-identical-class collective-pitch helicopters from two of the most active manufacturers in the small-heli segment. Here is which one is actually the better buy for which pilot.
The OMP M2 Explorer and Goosky S2 occupy almost exactly the same product slot — 200-class collective-pitch, 3S battery, around 750–850g flying weight, mid-£400s street price. On paper they are competitive twins. In the air and in ownership, they are not. Here is the breakdown of which one is the better choice for the kind of pilot you actually are.
The headline specs
| | OMP M2 Explorer | Goosky S2 | |---|---|---| | Rotor diameter | 470mm | 460mm | | Flying weight | ~820g (3S 1300mAh) | ~780g (3S 1300mAh) | | Battery | 3S 1100–1500mAh | 3S 1100–1500mAh | | Motor | 2900kV brushless | 3100kV brushless | | Headspeed | ~2,400 RPM hover | ~2,500 RPM hover | | Flight controller | OMP Beast-like | Goosky GFB | | Receiver options | Spektrum SRXL2, FrSky, generic | Spektrum, FrSky, generic | | Street price BNF | £440 | £420 |
So-similar-it-does-not-matter on paper. The differences emerge in the air and in the ownership experience.
Build quality
Both helicopters are predominantly carbon-fibre frame with metal components in the rotor head and tail. Both are well-engineered.
The M2 Explorer has the edge in fit-and-finish. The carbon edges are slightly more chamfered, the screws are slightly more uniform in torque from the factory, and the canopy fit is slightly tighter. None of this affects flight; it affects the satisfaction of unboxing and the perception of value.
The S2 wins on cabling and routing. Goosky have done a noticeably tidier job of running the ESC and servo wiring through the frame — less zip-tie, less heat-shrink, less visible cable. For pilots who care about how the helicopter looks at the field this matters.
Long-term durability: both have proved robust in our 12-month evaluation. We have not seen meaningful structural differences between the two airframes after sustained use.
Flight characteristics
Hover stability is very close. The M2 is fractionally more stable in calm air; the S2 is fractionally more responsive in wind. Either characteristic is more about flight-controller tuning than airframe difference, and both manufacturers have shipped firmware updates that narrow the gap.
3D performance is where the differences emerge. The S2 has slightly more aggressive default cyclic response and reaches its 3D envelope with less stick deflection. The M2 is slightly more progressive and rewards a smoother stick technique. Neither is "better" — they are different feel profiles. A pilot used to one will find the other slightly off-feeling for the first few packs and then adjust.
Forward flight at speed favours the M2 slightly. The marginally heavier airframe (~40g) cuts through wind better and feels more planted at cruise. For pilots who want to do scale-style passes and flybys, the M2 is the marginally better airframe.
Flight controller and integration
This is where the genuine decision lives.
The OMP M2 has native Spektrum SRXL2 receiver compatibility built in. If you fly a Spektrum NX6, NX8, NX10 or similar radio, the M2 sets up with their SmartLink telemetry working out of the box. Battery voltage, RSSI, current draw all stream back to the transmitter. This is a genuinely useful integration that no competitor matches for Spektrum users.
The Goosky S2 has a more open receiver story. The BNF versions come with FrSky, FlySky, or Spektrum DSMX receivers as options. None of them telemeter as cleanly as the M2-on-Spektrum combination, but the receiver choice is more flexible.
If you fly a Spektrum radio, the M2 is the easier integration. Everything else, the S2 is more flexible.
Tuning and adjustability
Both flight controllers offer Bluetooth configuration via a phone app. The OMP app is the more polished — clearer UI, better explanations of each parameter, easier saving and loading of setup profiles. The Goosky app is functional but less refined.
For a pilot who wants to set the helicopter up once and never touch the tuning again, this difference does not matter. For a pilot who wants to experiment with pitch curves, gyro gains and 3D rates, the OMP app saves time.
Support and parts availability
Both manufacturers have established UK distribution. Goosky parts are slightly more widely stocked at UK retailers (more visible inventory at major sellers); OMP parts tend to require a slightly more direct relationship with their UK importer.
Replacement-blade pricing is essentially identical (£8–£12 per main blade pair). Tail rotor units are around £25 for either platform. Frame replacement is rarely needed; when it is, both are around £55.
Price
OMP M2 BNF: £440 typical street price. Goosky S2 BNF: £420 typical street price.
The £20 difference is roughly equal to one extra LiPo pack. Not a deciding factor.
Who buys which
The decision matrix:
- You fly a Spektrum radio: OMP M2 Explorer. The SRXL2 integration is worth the £20 premium
- You fly any other radio: Goosky S2. More flexible receiver options at slightly lower price
- You want the most polished out-of-box experience: OMP M2 Explorer
- You want the tidier cable routing and frame aesthetic: Goosky S2
- You want maximum responsiveness for 3D: Goosky S2
- You want maximum planted feel for forward flight and scale-style passes: OMP M2 Explorer
- You want to use the app to fine-tune extensively: OMP M2 Explorer
- You want widest UK parts availability: Goosky S2 by a small margin
What both have over their predecessors
The current generation of both machines is meaningfully better than the M1 and S1 that came before them. The flight controllers are tuned better, the tail authority is improved, and both have GPS-enabled options (M2 with optional GPS module, S2 with the GFB-Pro flight controller upgrade). For anyone moving up from a coaxial or small fixed-pitch trainer, either of these is a substantial step forward.
Verdict
The OMP M2 Explorer and Goosky S2 are both genuinely good 200-class collective-pitch helicopters. The decision between them is mostly about transmitter ecosystem and slight personal preference for flight characteristics. Neither is a bad choice.
For our default recommendation: OMP M2 Explorer for Spektrum users, Goosky S2 for everyone else. The difference between the two is small enough that you should not lose sleep either way — but it is real enough that getting it right means a slightly better first month of ownership.
Kit to build what you just read
All helicopters →
RC HelicoptersSMYA S107G Mini RC Helicopter
£29.99
FlishRC PartsFLISHRC Lipo Battery 5200mAh 6S 22.2V 35C for FL500
£55.99
RC HelicoptersC128 Military camera drone RC helicopter with HD camera
£89.99£99.99
Batteries & ChargersFLISHRC 4300mAh 25C 6S 22.2V LiPo Battery for 500 Size RC Helicopter
£41.89£55.29
Keep reading · Reviews
Best RC helicopters under £150: beginner shortlist 2026
Coaxials, small fixed-pitch trainers, and one collective-pitch surprise. Six helicopters under £150 that are actually worth buying as a first machine.

FLISHRC FL500 V2 reviewed: the £1,400 scale helicopter that actually flies
Fibreglass fuselage, GPS-stabilised L7 flight controller, six painted liveries. A serious 500-class scale platform at a price that used to buy you a chassis kit.
Goosky S1 reviewed: a year on, is it still the best £400 collective-pitch?
Five hundred grams of trainable 3D machine. Twelve months and 400 flights later, here is whether the Goosky S1 has held up — and what the competition has done to it.
